Preface

Index

Section 1

 

Contents

Preface

1   Section 1 : Is Gödel’s Platonist creation through definition valid?

 

            1-01   Gödel’s Theorem V

            1-02   Gödel’s reasoning in Theorem V

            1-03   Applying Gödel’s reasoning to x+y

            1-04   sum(x, y)’ cannot be directly expressed in S

            1-05   Platonist creation through definition

            1-06   Formal Number Theory

2   Section 2 : Why did Gödel ignore this reasoning?

 

            2-01   Gödel’s Theorem VI

            2-02   Gödel’s Theorem V

            2-03   The formula ‘(R, r)’

            2-04   ‘(R, r)’ is not provable in S

            2-05   ‘(R, r)’ is provable in S

            2-06   Gödel’s Theorem V is invalid

            2-07   Gödel’s formula ‘(G, g)’

            2-08   Gödel’s proof : ‘(G, g)’ is not provable in S

            2-09   Gödel’s proof : ‘(~G, g')’ is not provable in S

            2-10   In conclusion?

3      Section 3 : Is Mendelson’s use of the Gödel β-function valid?

 

            3-01   Gödel’s Theorem VI

            3-02   Mendelson’s version of Gödel’s proof

            3-03   Why is this reasoning ignored?

            3-04   The inconsistency in S

            3-05   Every primitive recursive formula is not expressible formally in a consistent S

            3-06   Conclusion : The fallacy in Mendelson’s reasoning

4      Section 4 : Does Gödel’s implicit intuitionist meta-thesis demolish strong AI?

 

            4-01   Gödel’s startling hypothesis

            4-02   Significance of Gödel’s hypothesis

            4-03   The ‘Liar’ paradox

            4-04   The ‘Russell’ paradox

            4-05   Creation through definition

            4-06   Gödel’s constructive formal system S

            4-07   Gödel’s arithmetisation of S

            4-08   Gödel’s remarkable insight

            4-09   Gödel’s explicit thesis

            4-10   Gödel’s implicit intuitionist thesis

            4-11   Gödel’s undecidable proposition

            4-12   The path Gödel ignored

            4-13   Was Gödel wrong?

            4-14   sum(x, y)’ cannot be expressed directly in S

            4-15   Platonist creation through definition

            4-16   Formal Number Theory

            4-17   Why did Gödel choose the path he chose?

            4-18   Gödel’s Theorems from a wider perspective

            4-19   The relative significance of Gödel’s reasoning

            4-20   So what does Gödel’s reasoning actually achieve?

            4-21   Addressing Platonism : What is Mathematics?

            4-22   In conclusion?

References

Roots

Bibliography

Web_links

Index       Title       Preface       Contents       Section 1       Section 2

Section 3       Section 4       References       Roots       Bibliography       Web_links

Beyond Gödel (2001)

 (Updated : 10/11/01 1:57:50 AM by re@alixcomsi.com)